
It’s safe to say that Revit has all the features you need from CAD software, improved by a large variety of useful tools to help understand the real-world processes and implications of the architectural design drawn with it. The software can also determine the exact weight of a building, calculate the amount and types of material needed, and overall project cost almost instantly. One of the main goals of BIM software is to help freelance 3D visualizers create coherent designs. Assuming you specify the round object as a stainless steel bearing ball, BIM understands its intended purpose and function, so it will assign industry-standard specifications – including the material, dimension, and physical properties – to the object. Revit design services can assign certain parameters and identifications.

For example, a round object in AutoCAD can be anything from a volleyball to a scorching hot planet unless you have additional data to identify what it is and how it behaves.īIM software provides a layer of specification information to the object. CAD and BIMĪ geometrical shape drawn using CAD software does not give information about its intended use. Whereas AutoCAD creates 2D geometries with 3D modeling capabilities, Revit emphasizes Building Information Modeling services (BIM) and is equipped with all sorts of functions to plan and track various stages in a building’s lifecycle from concept and construction to maintenance and demolition. It remains Autodesk’s flagship product, yet the company keeps developing a broad range of software for architectural design purposes, including Revit, introduced in April 2000. It allows freelance engineering design services to draft and model buildings or any other structure.

The popular software first appeared on PC in the early 1980s.ĪutoCAD is arguably the most definitive software of its kind. Without computerization, most architectural design services back in the day had no choice but to rely on manual drawings with a pencil. Despite the availability of commercial CAD programs, the only way to run them was on mainframe or mini-computers that could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in today’s money. Until around the middle of the 1980s, most architects who worked outside of research projects for governments, universities, and large corporations had no access to reliable 3D CAD software.
